Press "Enter" to skip to content

Club for Growth Amendment 10 ads saturate Missouri

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Missouri Club for Growth’s television ads for their campaign for Amendment 10 have flooded the airwaves in every media market in Missouri – each media market having their own tailored ad. MCFG Chairman Bev Randles appears casually dressed in the ads in a newscaster-like setting with pop ups highlighting her message and pictures of Gov. Jay Nixon.

“I’m Bev Randles. As a resident of Kansas City, Missouri, I want what is best for our area’s children,” Randles said in the Kansas City ad. “So, it’s appalling that Gov. Jay Nixon repeatedly withholds education dollars from our local schools, especially when they are working so hard to gain full accreditation. That’s failed leadership and it needs to stop. By voting yes on Amendment 10, it will stop. Let’s hold Jay Nixon accountable and stop him from playing political games with our tax dollars. This November, please join me in voting yes on Amendment 10.”

Today, the ad tailored for Southeast Missouri was released to The Missouri Times for public viewing. The ad shows Randles in a similar setting, supporting Amendment 10 because the same Southeast Missouri public schools that made her a success are the same experiencing withholdings today.

Amendment 10 appears on the ballot as a result of the state legislature’s passage of House Joint Resolution 72 during the 2014 regular session. According to a January press release, Rep. Todd Richardson (R-Poplar Bluff), the primary sponsor of the joint resolution, said Amendment 10 “would provide the Missouri General Assembly with an effective check and balance on the governor’s questionable decisions to withhold funding to vital state services such as education, law enforcement and mental health.”

Richardson
Richardson

“We have never seen a governor withhold funding at the level Gov. Nixon has year after year,” Richardson said at the time. “It is a clear abuse of his constitutional authority that is meant to be limited to times when our state is in a funding crisis. As our governor continues to propose more and more spending while withholding funds already appropriated by the legislature it is clear that we have to restore the balance that is meant to exist between the branches of government.”

Amendment 10 will appear on the November 4 ballot as follows:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to require the governor to pay the public debt, to prohibit the governor from relying on revenue from legislation not yet passed when proposing a budget, and to provide a legislative check on the governors decisions to restrict funding for education and other state services? State governmental entities expect no direct costs or savings. Local governmental entities expect an unknown fiscal impact.

“The Missouri Club for Growth supports Amendment 10 because it is time for Governor Jay Nixon to stop playing politics with our tax dollars,” said Randles in a recent release. “For years, Governor Nixon has repeatedly held the state budget hostage for political purposes, negatively affecting our public schools and causing unnecessary funding delays for much needed projects and services throughout the state. I strongly encourage voters to support Amendment 10 because it is an action supported by both Republicans and Democrats that will finally put a check on Jay Nixon’s ability to wreak havoc on the appropriations process and the citizens of Missouri.”

Nixon told reporters earlier this month he would be voting against the measure, and that his constitutional authority to withhold certain funds was specifically identified by Standard & Poor in awarding Missouri’s AAA credit rating. Removing Nixon’s authority over the budget would place it in the hands of the legislature, won’t solve the problem, he says, it just moves it to a different place.

“I certainly won’t be voting for something that goes directly against what Standard & Poor has said about retaining our credit rating,” Nixon said.

However, MCFG is tired of hearing the “same rhetoric” from Nixon.

Abrajano
Abrajano
“Jay Nixon has been using the same rhetoric for years. It seems every time there is an opposition group with an opinion that doesn’t mesh with the governor’s, his go-to position is some sort of ‘sky is falling’ argument about our state’s credit rating,” said MCFG spokesman Todd Abrajano. “Despite Nixon’s claims, we passed income tax cuts in SB509 and we haven’t seen the state’s credit rating decrease. Passing Amendment 10 would have no impact on Missouri’s ability to borrow money. It’s a pointless argument for Nixon with no basis in reality. It’s really just a scare tactic. This is really standard rhetoric for Nixon which he uses all the time when he thinks he isn’t going to get his way.”
The Missouri Budget Project is slightly skeptical about how this amendment will play in longterm.
“This isn’t about any particular governor, this is a constitutional amendment that will be around for a long time,” said Traci Gleason of MBP. “We’re worried about the long term effects and political stalemate if no one person has the ability to balance the state budget. Since Kit Bond in 1981, every elected Governor from both parties has used budget restrictions to keep Missouri’s spending in balance.”